请教GWD逻辑题，标题要长。。。。。。。。。。

andreasyang

In two months, the legal minimum wage in the country of Kirlandia will increase
from five Kirlandic dollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of
this increase have argued that the resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation
rate up. In fact its impact on wages will probably be negligible, since only a
very small proportion of all Kirfandic workers are currently receiving less than
KD5.50 per hour.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Most people in kirlandia who are currently earning the minimum wage have
 been employed at their current jobs for less than a year.
B. Some firms in Kirlandia have paid workers considerably less than KD5.00
 per hour, in violation of kirlandic employment regulations.
C. Many businesses hire trainees at or near the minimum wage but must
 reward trained workers by keeping their paylevels above the pay level
 of trainees.
D. The greatest growth in Kirlandia’s economy in recent years has been in
  those sectors where workers earn wages that tend to be much higher
  than the minimum wage.
E The current minimum wage is insufficient for a worker holding only one job  
to earn enough to support a family ,even when working full time at that job.

答案是B，可我觉得既然现在violate regulation,那么以后也可以继续violate，不用提高wage啊

liuconglei

我觉得你的思维有点进入误区。
你现在就在扣这个选项的错误去了。
真正的CR做起来，你不用管选项的对错啊，只要它的说法是weaken就可以了。
原文是说 提高工资的影响可以忽略不计，因为只有很小一部分人的工资<5.5
B说 （哪儿啊）一些公司给人家开工资都<5.了 这可是违反了这个规章制度的。
后面这句实际上是个定从的。省了which is.