ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker's Beach, the world's sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker's Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago. Clearly, environmentalists' prediction that the world's Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in refutation of the environmentalists' prediction?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1577|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD裸机一道,路过的同学帮我看看啊~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-7 21:00:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the world’s sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching.Yet the number of adult female Merricks
returning to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago.Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick
population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in refutation of the environmentalists’ prediction?



A.The chemical spill five years ago occurred at a time when there were neither Merrick sea turtles nor Merrick sea turtle eggs on Baker’s Beach.

B.Female Merrick sea turtles begin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs when they are ten years old.


C.Under normal conditions, only a small proportion of hatchling female Merrick sea turtles survive in the ocean until adulthood and return to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach.

D.Environmental pressures unrelated to the chemical spill have caused a significant decline in the population of one of the several species of sea birds that prey on Merrick sea turtle eggs.

E.After the chemical spill, an environmental group rejected a proposal to increase the Merrick sea turtle population by transferring eggs from Baker’s Beach to nearby beaches that had not been affected by the spill.

这题我在B\D间犹豫了一下,最后选了D,请高人指点一下为什么选B啊?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-8 09:00:32 | 只看该作者
这道题有人能帮我解释一下麽?电脑出问题了,搞出来居然变这样~~
板凳
发表于 2010-9-8 09:08:56 | 只看该作者
这个题目可以在CD上面搜索一下哦~是典型的老美思维,还是看到大家智慧的结晶比较印象深刻,建议搜索一下
地板
发表于 2010-9-8 10:55:43 | 只看该作者
回来产卵的龟都是十年前的,跟五年前的事故无关……
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-8 14:24:26 | 只看该作者
题目的最后一句为什么推测是decline,不应该是增加了吗?
楼上的能不能再解释下,还是没想明白~~~
6#
发表于 2010-9-8 17:29:08 | 只看该作者
Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick
population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.
姐帮你直白的翻译一下。 很明显,环保主义者提出的关于M数量减少的推测(作为。。的结果)是错的。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-8 17:46:05 | 只看该作者
Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick
population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.
姐帮你直白的翻译一下。 很明显,环保主义者提出的关于M数量减少的推测(作为。。的结果)是错的。
-- by 会员 菜泡饭 (2010/9/8 17:29:08)

那这题为什么选C啊,还是看不明白~~郁闷~~
8#
发表于 2010-9-8 20:59:08 | 只看该作者
Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick
population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.
姐帮你直白的翻译一下。 很明显,环保主义者提出的关于M数量减少的推测(作为。。的结果)是错的。
-- by 会员 菜泡饭 (2010/9/8 17:29:08)


那这题为什么选C啊,还是看不明白~~郁闷~~
-- by 会员 serenashu (2010/9/8 17:46:05)

我觉得选b, 题目中说了因为回来产卵的龟多了,所以数量不会减。b选项说的意思是之所以回来的龟多了,那是因为现在这些回来的龟还没有受到影响,他们是十年前走的。换句话说就是,影响肯定会有的,就是没到时候呢。 就是驳斥了论据。选b
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 09:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部