牛牛们帮忙看看啊

summer614

In one state , all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinance . A petition entitled “ petition for statewide smoking restriction “ is being circulated to voters by campain workers who ask only .’ Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction ?” the petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public .

Which of the following circumstances would make the petitionj as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide ?

The state law would not affect existing local ordinances baning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard   

Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers

In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishment and government offices that are open to the public

The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does

There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking

a

A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies by the Greek playwright Euripides . of  these, ten called the “select plays “, are  accompanied in L  by  ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts, this group includes some of euripides’best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order , without commentary , the Electra is one of the alphabeticals.

Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the statements given

Only euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts

The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries because they were the best known of euripides’ works

No commentaries were written about Euripides’ electra in ancient times

Euripides’ medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary

Eruipides’Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript,

e

想不明白，大家帮帮忙啊

番茄炒蛋

不是NN，尝试一下，

第一题说voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide

而A中又说The state law would not affect existing local ordinances

所以这当然会misleading咯，呵呵，我都看不懂了

第二题较好理解，说是有18个剧本吧，其中十个呢are  accompanied in L  by  ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts

The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order , without commentary ,

the Electra就属于这后八个，所以 Eruipides’Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript

憧憬

以下是引用番茄炒蛋在2004-4-24 22:52:00的发言：

不是NN，尝试一下，

第一题说voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide

而A中又说The state law would not affect existing local ordinances

所以这当然会misleading咯，呵呵，我都看不懂了

第二题较好理解，说是有18个剧本吧，其中十个呢are  accompanied in L  by  ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts

The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order , without commentary ,

the Electra就属于这后八个，所以 Eruipides’Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript

题目中说的是 某一个manuscript   选项中说的是any extant medieval manuscript啊。

tianwan

第二题有疑问：10个既有注解 也出现在别的中世纪的手稿中。那剩下的8个可能有3种情况：有注解 不出现在别的中世纪的手稿中；没有注解 出现在别的中世纪的手稿中（同时可能在别的中世纪的手稿中有注解，这个别的中世纪的手稿可能是extant）；没有注解 不出现在别的中世纪的手稿中。

请NN帮助理解。

mariezhu

第一题我怎么看着象D啊，难道脑子出问题了？想不通

既然voters understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide即新举措只是原来举措的延伸， 那么对他们而言misleading 的应该是新举措推翻了现存的举措，所以D，The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does。而A说不会推翻已有的规定，那么新规定就可以被堂而皇之地视作extending啊

请大牛指示！

第二题我和tianwangg有相同疑问，不过如果考试一路看下来用排除法，也只能是E了，其它明显错误

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-25 15:54:32编辑过]

weiyu

T2

Any tragedy such as Electra accompanied by a commentary is not included in the medieval manuscript mentioned in the first sentence, therefore if Electra without commentary can be found in other extant medieval manuscript, the assertion that the manuscript mentioned at the beginning of argument contains all extant tragedies may not be right.

番茄炒蛋

再尝试一把

第一题得misleading之处是在于原文得那些voters相信通过使立法全国话可以有助于大家都遵守这个条例，而A中所说呢是有时候全国得法规不一定可以影响到地方得法规，这就表现出了一对矛盾，而D正好是反向说明了全国性得法规是可以强加并修改地方法规得，对原文是一个support

第二题

既然原文得The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order , without commentary , the Electra is one of the alphabeticals.

表明 the Electra is without commentary

那答案中得Eruipides’Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript更应该是在原文得那个范围之内了，我感觉没有什么问题啊

举个例子，

番茄不是个MM

问：能推出什么咚咚

答：番茄肯定不是个喜欢吃番茄得MM

憧憬

以下是引用番茄炒蛋在2004-4-25 16:05:00的发言：

再尝试一把

第一题得misleading之处是在于原文得那些voters相信通过使立法全国话可以有助于大家都遵守这个条例，而A中所说呢是有时候全国得法规不一定可以影响到地方得法规，这就表现出了一对矛盾，而D正好是反向说明了全国性得法规是可以强加并修改地方法规得，对原文是一个support

第二题

既然原文得The other eight, which appear in alphabetical order , without commentary , the Electra is one of the alphabeticals.

表明 the Electra is without commentary

那答案中得Eruipides’Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript更应该是在原文得那个范围之内了，我感觉没有什么问题啊

举个例子，

番茄不是个MM

问：能推出什么咚咚

答：番茄肯定不是个喜欢吃番茄得MM

题目中说的是L这个manuscript啊，选项中说的是所有的现存的manuscript,在L这个manuscript中没有不代表在所有的现存的manuscript中也没有啊

mariezhu

以下是引用番茄炒蛋在2004-4-25 16:05:00的发言：

再尝试一把

第一题得misleading之处是在于原文得那些voters相信通过使立法全国话可以有助于大家都遵守这个条例，而A中所说呢是有时候全国得法规不一定可以影响到地方得法规，这就表现出了一对矛盾，而D正好是反向说明了全国性得法规是可以强加并修改地方法规得，对原文是一个support

番茄GG，第一题题目问Which of the following circumstances would make the petitionj as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide ，即voters 相信proposal是local ordiances的延伸（不是更改），问那种情况会对他们产生误导作用。那么如果A，则新规定没有更改就规定，岂不是正可以视为extending?

Any clarification will be highly appreciated.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-25 16:23:35编辑过]

jnlvo

2. 如果Electra appear accompanied by a commentary in some extant medieval manuscripts,那么Electra就也可属于前10中，这样与原文矛盾。