OG10 78 想不通啊

追命Brian

A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.
(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.

题目都读得懂 感觉题目的逻辑错误有点all things are equal 但是就是选不出 答案是A 请各位NN指点下 谢谢

2008115061

文章的条件是小孩子的判断和是否故意不符合，就推理小孩子是非不分。但A就削弱了条件，说明大人在读故事的时候扭曲了是否故意，结果造成了小孩子现在的结果  因此削弱了推理过程。

追命Brian

文章的条件是小孩子的判断和是否故意不符合，就推理小孩子是非不分。但A就削弱了条件，说明大人在读故事的时候扭曲了是否故意，结果造成了小孩子现在的结果  因此削弱了推理过程。

-- by 会员 2008115061 (2010/8/23 12:22:21)

恩 这样好像说的通了 谢谢哈