一道逻辑请大家帮忙

lizzylovely

GWD7-Q41:
Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?
    
A.    Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
B.    Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
C.    Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
D.    Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
E.    Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes
答案选C，我不太懂C的意思

15120040234wxl

同问！！

bdsjb116

“evaluate”题型
1、定义： 对某个问题两方面的回答（yes and no）或者某个信息两方面的回答，对原文推理如果      一方面回答起到支持作用，则另一方面回答起到驳斥作用，如果一方面回答起到驳斥作用，则另一方面回答起到支持作用，这个问题或者信息就对原文有评价作用。
★注意一定是yes and no回答都起到作用，如果仅仅一方面回答起到作用，则不是评价

-------------------------------
ABE都是无关选项 只有CD提到了两个review 而只有C提到了两者的区别

(直接排除法选的 也没太懂C的意思)