ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 6414|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

两道题的对比

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-13 13:36:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the reasoning in the passage?
Kernland’s government restricts the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure a low-cost supply for domestic processing plants.  Though the policy constrains farm income and limits the number of farmers who can profitably grow cashews, the government defends it on the grounds that, since the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the restrictions would hurt efforts to reduce urban unemployment.  However, the policy may actually have contributed to urban unemployment, since __________.
A. a lack of profitable crops is driving many small cashew farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities
B. some of the by-products of cashew processing are used as raw materials by other industries located in Kernland’s cities
C. the government does not place similar restrictions on the export of any crop other than cashews
D. the income earned by workers in the processing plants is generally greater than that earned by agricultural laborers in rural areas
E. without governmental aid in some form, Kernland’s cashew processing plants would not be able to compete for sales in world markets
答案选A
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.
答案选E
大家应该看到了,两道题的答案都选A。两道题的题干也是基本一样的,但是问的题目恰恰相反,所以答案不可能一样的。我觉得第一题的答案给的是正确的。第二题的答案出错了。希望牛人能帮我解决疑惑。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-14 00:22:38 | 只看该作者
lz  第二题是weaken题,需要做的工作是和最后一句话反向: removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
这句话的意思是说:removiing这个regulation会加剧失业,换句话说,就是这个禁止出口的规定是能保障就业
weaken下来的结果就是:实际上这个policy会导致失业
这样的话,这道题不就和However, the policy may actually have contributed to urban unemployment, since(第一道)一样了吗
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-15 14:33:55 | 只看该作者
有道理,当时被题目绕晕了,谢谢你解答。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 15:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部