- UID
- 458239
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover. Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument? A. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese. B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date. C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years. D. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons. E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural preda
我查了帖子,集中在对于B这句话的理解上, 如果B 指的是“因为restriction而导致的比截止日早结束这种情况在许多年前就消失了”,那我就理解这个weaken了
可是,我看不出B是这个意思的! B. It has been many yearssince the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date. 实在就是说restriction导致了hunting season提前结束,那么现在废除限制,确实就allow the other species to recover. 这不是加强么。。。 |
|