ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: smilingyuer
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文]柒月贰拾玖日起坐稳狗狗汇总 --- 结贴至 扒月贰拾

[精华] [复制链接]
141#
发表于 2010-8-9 01:01:37 | 只看该作者
继续贴……今天忙了一天,就想了两篇。去睡了
9.“Scientists are continuallyredefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment.Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing theirproducts and processes in response to each new recommendation until thoserecommendations become government regulations.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion statedabove. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your ownexperience, observations, or reading.
这个问题,depends on towhat extent the standards are redefined.
如果新的standard和原有standard差异很大的话,一个企业应该去跟着standard变化而变化。因为目前人们关注环保的意识已经越来越强了,他们更加倾向于购买环保产品。For example, the marketing performance of many refrigeratorscontaining Fluorine goes down soon after the research result that the Fluorinewill damage the ozone layer is released. People now prefer the refrigeratorswhich save electricity to save the limited energy of the earth. 如果一个企业can’t catch up with the most recent theories and trend ofenvironmental protection, it is likely that it will lose a huge market sharedue to their bad image of “not taking social and environmental responsibilities”.
但是我认为,有时候科学研究的结论并没有发生实质的变化,这种情况下就没有必要随时随地梗着理论研究结论而变化。一个企业也要有自己的行为准则。一个企业也像人一样,应该有自己的判断标准和行为依据。科学家的研究结果可以作为参考,但是最终做决定的依然是企业的管理者。所以说管理者对于环保标准的定义应该比科学家对环保标准的定义更重要。
所以对于这个问题,我觉得一个企业的management应该首先set up a corporate social and environmental goal in protecting theearth, and then analyze the current trend and main direction in theenvironmental barriers of its industry. They should try their best to reducethe negative influences to the largest extent as they may achieve, so when thenew benchmark appears, they may already meet the criteria. But if they do comeacross some new environmental challenges, they should consider the new benchmarkcarefully and focus on how to meet the new requirements.
142#
发表于 2010-8-9 07:23:53 | 只看该作者
谢谢
143#
发表于 2010-8-9 09:52:59 | 只看该作者
感谢LZ~~~~~  辛苦辛苦!!~~
144#
发表于 2010-8-9 10:57:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢lz
145#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-9 11:08:36 | 只看该作者
楼主我觉得咱们机经35题特别像黄金80里的106题,你看看哈
PS谢谢你为大家整理机经哈!!!祝好运!!!

106. The following appeared as part of a business plan by the Capital Idea Investment firm.
“Currently more and more books are becoming available in electronic form — either free of charge on the Internet or for a very low price per book on CD-ROM.* People who would not pay bookstore prices will now have access to whatever book they want from their home or work computers. Consequently, literary classics are likely to be read more widely than ever before: 72 percent of those responding to a recent online survey said they would read books in electronic form, and 81 percent said they believed that reading classic works was important. Given this newly developing market, we should invest in E-Classics, a new company that sells electronic versions of literary classics.”
*A CD-ROM is a small portable disc capable of storing relatively large amounts of data that can be read by a computer.
-- by 会员 好心情 (2010/8/8 18:25:19)



呵呵,非常感谢你提供source哈,我去check了,ms是同一题,percent的数值都一样
146#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-9 11:18:31 | 只看该作者
继续贴……今天忙了一天,就想了两篇。去睡了
9.“Scientists are continuallyredefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment.Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing theirproducts and processes in response to each new recommendation until thoserecommendations become government regulations.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion statedabove. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your ownexperience, observations, or reading.
这个问题,depends on towhat extent the standards are redefined.
如果新的standard和原有standard差异很大的话,一个企业应该去跟着standard变化而变化。因为目前人们关注环保的意识已经越来越强了,他们更加倾向于购买环保产品。For example, the marketing performance of many refrigeratorscontaining Fluorine goes down soon after the research result that the Fluorinewill damage the ozone layer is released. People now prefer the refrigeratorswhich save electricity to save the limited energy of the earth. 如果一个企业can’t catch up with the most recent theories and trend ofenvironmental protection, it is likely that it will lose a huge market sharedue to their bad image of “not taking social and environmental responsibilities”.
但是我认为,有时候科学研究的结论并没有发生实质的变化,这种情况下就没有必要随时随地梗着理论研究结论而变化。一个企业也要有自己的行为准则。一个企业也像人一样,应该有自己的判断标准和行为依据。科学家的研究结果可以作为参考,但是最终做决定的依然是企业的管理者。所以说管理者对于环保标准的定义应该比科学家对环保标准的定义更重要。
所以对于这个问题,我觉得一个企业的management应该首先set up a corporate social and environmental goal in protecting theearth, and then analyze the current trend and main direction in theenvironmental barriers of its industry. They should try their best to reducethe negative influences to the largest extent as they may achieve, so when thenew benchmark appears, they may already meet the criteria. But if they do comeacross some new environmental challenges, they should consider the new benchmarkcarefully and focus on how to meet the new requirements.
-- by 会员 yougushizi (2010/8/9 1:01:37)




我的一点comments:这里的stardard:企业应该看这个stardard的实质,以及跟自己企业的相关性然后去决定,如果跟自己的企业的相关性大,那为了企业着想应该去keep shifting。可能要比stardard新旧差异大小要好点。

呵呵,仅供参考.
147#
发表于 2010-8-9 11:34:31 | 只看该作者
楼主楼主,快告诉我你为啥这么牛呢
148#
发表于 2010-8-9 12:08:21 | 只看该作者
AI Analysis  from yougushizi.docx这个文件怎么下载不下来呢?
149#
发表于 2010-8-9 13:29:51 | 只看该作者
请问 AI Analysis  from yougushizi.docx可以转檔吗?
开不开耶~~
谢谢
150#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-9 13:46:35 | 只看该作者
请问 AI Analysis  from yougushizi.docx可以转檔吗?
开不开耶~~
谢谢
-- by 会员 greta66 (2010/8/9 13:29:51)



呵呵,转了,你再试下吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-8 17:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部