ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9378|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Passage 10 (10/63)-T2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-20 05:37:00 | 只看该作者

Passage 10 (10/63)-T2


Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called “the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth.” Snyder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed that caffeine affect behavior by countering the activity in the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical called adenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firing in many areas of the brain. It apparently does this by inhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicals that carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next. Like many other agents that affect neuron firing, adenosine must first bind to specific receptors on neuronal membranes. There are at least two classes of these receptors, which have been designated A1 and A2. Snyder et al (et al: abbr. (Lat) 以及其他人,等人) propose that caffeine, which is structurally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both types of receptors, which prevents adenosine from attaching there and allows the neurons to fire more readily than they otherwise would.新观点,生物的文章关键在于搞清各个物件的关系  咖啡因receptor—A—N—NF


For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attributed to its inhibition of the production of phosphodiesterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemical called cyclic AMP. A number of neurotransmitters exert their effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentrations in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at the elevated concentrations, as might be brought about by a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greater amount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behavioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that the caffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher than those that produce stimulation. Moreover, other compounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are not stimulants.老观点,反驳老观点P—A—NF


To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by preventing adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared the stimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives with their ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “the ability of the compounds to compete at the receptors correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion in the mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at the receptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomotion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeine and the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most effective compounds in both regards.支持新观点


There were some apparent exceptions to the general correlation observed between adenosine-receptor binding and stimulation. One of these was a compound called 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), which bound very well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyder et al suggests that this is not a major stumbling block (stumbling block: n.障碍物, 绊脚石) to their hypothesis. The problem is that the compound has mixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence with psychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally known only for its stimulatory effects, displays this property, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.例外



2.     Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the theory proposed by Snyder et al?花时222秒,选了B,其他选项已排除,没有搞清原文的对应部分,即哪个部分是用来支持观点的


(A) At very low concentrations in the human brain, both caffeine and theophylline tend to have depressive rather than stimulatory effects on human behavior.


(B) The ability of caffeine derivatives at very low concentrations to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in mouse brains correlates well with their ability to stimulate mouse locomotion at these low concentrations.


B的观点与原文的观点一致


(C) The concentration of cyclic AMP in target neurons in the human brain that leads to increased neuron firing can be produced by several different phosphodiesterase inhibitors in addition to caffeine.


(D) The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.D


“the ability of the compounds to compete at the receptors correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion in the mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at the receptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomotion


(E) The concentration of IBMX required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in mouse brains is much smaller than the concentration that stimulates locomotion in the mouse.



这题我错了


D我找的对应部分对吗  可是 也文中没有The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans



谢谢

推荐
发表于 2012-8-6 18:32:08 | 只看该作者
这个推理过程可以在第二段S反驳老观点那里找到~
But S point out that the C concentrations needed to inhibit the production of P in the brain are much higher than those that produce stimulation.
C要想阻止P,阻止P的浓度要大于刺激的浓度。否则,浓度先达到阻止P,再达到刺激,就没法刺激了
生化文章,用表比较的结构来表时间先后
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-20 05:56:00 | 只看该作者

pumpkin 谢谢你的及时回答


可是你找到这句与D也没有什么对应关系


你找的这句  在低时抑制  在高时刺激


我发现 在生化类的文章中这样的逻辑题相当难 有时找了半天也找不对 不知会有什么好办法


谢谢

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-20 11:21:00 | 只看该作者

你说的那个电流我刚做了 那题是第六题是加强 比较简单 没有什么疑问


这题中


caffeine要达到取代a物质, 发挥刺激作用的量比直接发挥刺激需要的量大的多. ==>不需要取代a物质就可以刺激了


你这个推理过程是如何来的啊



谢谢

地板
发表于 2004-4-20 22:56:00 | 只看该作者

首段的内容理解稍有偏差,就会出错。本题是:是现有鸡还是现有蛋的问题。在讲解一下首段:

Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called “the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth.” Snyder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed that caffeine affect behavior by countering the activity in the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical called adenosine (C通过抑制Ad产生刺激作用). Adenosine normally depresses neuron firing in many areas of the brain. It apparently does this by inhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicals that carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next. Like many other agents that affect neuron firing, adenosine must first bind to specific receptors on neuronal membranes(Ad和受体结合抑制兴奋). There are at least two classes of these receptors, which have been designated A1 and A2. Snyder et al (et al: abbr. (Lat) 以及其他人,等人) propose that caffeine, which is structurally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both types of receptors, which prevents adenosine from attaching there and allows the neurons to fire more readily than they otherwise would(C和Ad的结构相同使得C可以抢占Ad的受体,从而产生刺激作用).

这段的核心意思是C是通过抑制Ad来产生兴奋作用的。

(B)The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.

B说C首先产生兴奋作用,然后才抑制Ad. 这个过程和原文描述的正好相反。

胡说一通,欢迎指正

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-21 00:14:00 | 只看该作者

weiyu ,pumpkin 这题我明白了 谢谢你们耐心的解释


感觉这类题相当地难 不知在今后碰到有什么好办法  


谢谢


(B)The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.

B说C首先产生兴奋作用,然后才抑制Ad. 这个过程和原文描述的正好相反。

6#
发表于 2004-4-21 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

paopao无疑否定过程的生物和可以文章难于否定数量的文章。没有别的办法,只能搞清过程。


个人意见,欢迎指正

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-21 01:37:00 | 只看该作者

weiyu  我感觉这类文章的推导过程我是清楚的  我的问题在于在选项中 碰到 不会多转一个弯 以这题为例


B)The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.


B说C首先产生兴奋作用,然后才抑制Ad. 这个过程和原文描述的正好相反。


我在做题中 得不到以上的结论 我得到的是


C要抑制A的浓度高于C产生兴奋的浓度


你知道我这样的问题有什么办法来解决吗


再次感谢weiyu和pumpkin 祝你们考试顺利

8#
发表于 2004-4-21 21:48:00 | 只看该作者

这是ETS常用的选项同意改写手段,就是用比较结构来描述原文没有用比较结构,但是做了比较的东东。


比如原文说A方法主要考虑X因素,B方法主要考虑Y因素,然后是A方法的优缺点,最终还是B比较好


问题:本文主要讲了什么


如果选项说:一个考虑X因素更多(more than)的方法的特点。这里ETS就用more than来迷惑你,让你把对的认为是错的。


胡说一通,欢迎指正

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-22 00:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用weiyu在2004-4-21 21:48:00的发言:

这是ETS常用的选项同意改写手段,就是用比较结构来描述原文没有用比较结构,但是做了比较的东东。


比如原文说A方法主要考虑X因素,B方法主要考虑Y因素,然后是A方法的优缺点,最终还是B比较好


问题:本文主要讲了什么


如果选项说:一个考虑X因素更多(more than)的方法的特点。这里ETS就用more than来迷惑你,让你把对的认为是错的。


胡说一通,欢迎指正



weiyu, 谢谢你啊 真的是这样的


这就需要读出原文与选项之间的联系来  如果是我我就把这个选项排除了


你是如何训练这种本领的呢  读出比较选项与原文的关系


谢谢

10#
发表于 2004-4-22 08:23:00 | 只看该作者

Summery


1. in normal brains,


adenosine + recepter => inhibition


2. Syne's theory,


caffeine (replacing adenosine) + recepter => stimulation


3. for experiments to prove the theoy, the following should be true:


The more caffeine, the more stimulation.


-------


So,  D) The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.


If D is true, (for example, an experiment shows that you need) 5 units of caffeine to replace adenosine, and that you need 500 units to produce stimulation.


Then caffeine must not produce stimulation via relacing adenosine, right ?


Because 5 units is alrealy enough for dislodging, how come it doesn't produce stimulation until it reaches 500.


對了,我下的OG只有6道題, 27722卻9道?



您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-24 23:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部