ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2132|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东逻辑,不懂的问题, 请指教~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-19 15:52:00 | 只看该作者

陈向东逻辑,不懂的问题, 请指教~

page334 第4题  贴不上来了 就是买书那道题GRE的题 我选C他选E 我不知道为什么c错了~~请帮我看看


page 248 第18题又是一个GRE题。 我选C 他选a 但是不对吧,1984年失业人数上升 失业率不变当然统计的总就业数量要增加了 是c才对啊


page244 第10题 还是GRE题 ,我选E 他选d  d 怎么可能对阿? 不找边际的 是不是他标错了?


page254 第30题


        A recent survey of all auto accident victims in laceName>DolelaceName> laceType>CountylaceType> found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.


The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?


(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.


(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in laceName>DolelaceName> laceType>CountylaceType> always wear seat belts when traveling by car.


(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.


(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.(A)


(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in laceName>DolelaceName> County do not involve any serious injury.


这个可能是数学脑袋转不过来, 也没有解释。 想不出来为什么是A


谢谢大家帮我看看




沙发
发表于 2004-4-20 04:24:00 | 只看该作者

Hi, this is from a website called testmagic, so i copied it here, hope this help.

"I agree that B supports the argument, but it's not a mandatory condition of the argument. A is a weaker statement but it's the correct answer because if A isn't true, then the argument is incorrect.

If seatbelts had no effect on injury, then you'd expect to find the same seatbelt rate among both injured and non-injured accident participants, meaning that if 80% of injured crash participants didn't wear seatbelts, then 80% of non-injured crash participants would also not have seatbelts. In other words, non-injured crash participants would have just a 20% with-seatbelt rate.

But if a seatbelt raises a crash participant's chances of ending up in the non-injured set, then the percentage of non-injured participants wearing seatbelts is greater 20%. If the injured participant seatbelt rate is 20%, and the non-injured participant seatbelt rate is greater than 20%, then the seatbelt rate for all crash participants is also somewhat greater than 20%.

There for (A) is a necessary condition for the argument to be true."

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-20 18:43:00 | 只看该作者
这么绕阿~  原来是取非法。 谢谢lixwytl mm

地板
发表于 2004-4-28 11:08:00 | 只看该作者

page244 第10题

我理解是,因为第二句说:that is,they tend to be written in response not to reality but to other works of literature,就是说,它们不应该是反映现实而应该是反映其他文学作品的,我理解是,这句话说明,它曾经被认为是应该是反映现实的,所以选D。

5#
发表于 2004-4-28 11:21:00 | 只看该作者

page 248 第18题

这个题是你没看清题啊,题目说的是,公共部门减少的就业总数多于私人部门增加的就业总数,就说明总就业数量减少了呀,所以C不对呀!

6#
发表于 2004-4-28 11:25:00 | 只看该作者

page254 第30题

如果A不正确,说明不发生事故的人也是80%没有系安全带,和发生事故的人比例一样了,就说明系不系安全带和发生严重受伤的事故没什么关系了,所以选A。

呵呵,希望我说的中文你能看懂,另外,帮我看看我的问题呀!

7#
发表于 2004-4-29 09:57:00 | 只看该作者

248, 18题:这样可能容易理解:

80年:公共:100人,私:100人,失业的人数时0, 失业率是0/总的劳动力数量

-84年:公共:100-10=90人,私:100+8=108人,失业的人数是2个,失业率是2/总的劳动力数量。

这下你能看出来了吧,只有在总的劳动力数量变小的情况下才能让两个失业率相同

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-29 13:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部