ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a certain wildlife park, park rangers are able to track the movements of many rhinoceroses because those animals wear radio collars. When, as often happens, a collar slips off, it is put back on. Putting a collar on a rhinoceros involves immobilizing the animal by shooting it with a tranquilizer dart. Female rhinoceroses that have been frequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollared females. Probably, therefore, some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3215|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP软件里的一道题,想不通。。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-23 21:22:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In a certain wildlife park, park rangers are able to track the movements of many rhinoceroses because those animals wear radio collars. When, as often happens, a collar slips off, it is put back on. Putting a collar on a rhinoceros involves immobilizing the animal by shooting it with a tranquilizer dart. Female rhinoceroses that have been frequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollared females. Probably, some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.
In evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?
A. Whether there are more collared female rhinoceroses than uncollared female rhinoceroses in the park.
B. How the tranquilizer that is usd for immobilizing rhinoceroses differs, if at all, from tranquilizers used in working with other large mammals.
C. How often park rangers need to use tranquilizer darts to immobilize rhinoceroses for reasons other than attaching radio collars.
D. Whether male rhinoceroses in the wildlife park lose their collars any more than the park's female rhinoceroses do.
E. Whether radio collars are the only practical means that park rangers have for tracking the movements of rhinoceroses in the park.
答案是C,何解。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-23 22:45:27 | 只看该作者
I think here we need to evaluate whether frequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollared females has relationship with tranquilizer
If tranquilizer also used for reasons other than attaching radio collars, there is no direct relationship between tranquilizer and recollared lower fertility rates
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-24 10:16:52 | 只看该作者
我还是无法理解,即使如楼上所说,tranquilizer also used for reasons other than attaching radio collars,我们也只能知道recollar和lower fertility rates可能无关,但不能推出tranquilizer和lower fertility rates无关啊。。。
地板
发表于 2010-7-24 10:46:34 | 只看该作者
楼主可以搜一搜以前的帖子,讲的挺清楚的。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-24 17:46:38 | 只看该作者
那个。。。我不太会搜索。。。
6#
发表于 2010-7-25 01:49:11 | 只看该作者
原题的逻辑是,频繁的 recollared的母H比uncollared的母H怀孕率低,所以可能是麻醉剂里有避孕物质。
D选项是 除recollared外,对H使用麻醉剂的频率。
如果是除了recollared外,使用麻醉剂的对象就不局限于collared和uncollared。对象是整体的母H。
如果除了recollared外,使用频率很高的话,说明整体的母H都有大量接触麻醉剂的可能性。
从而推断出 recollared的母H比uncollared的母H怀孕率低,可能与麻醉剂无关。

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-25 14:53:37 | 只看该作者
啊,明白了,多谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 21:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部