livia姐。。。我也来问个题。。。 Unlike most other mergers in the utility industry, which have been driven by the need to save money and extend companies’ service areas, the merger of the nation’s leading gas and electric company is intended to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question with states opening their utility markets to competition. A. and electric company is intended to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question with states opening B. and electric companies are intended to create a huge network for marketing the utilities in question as states open C. and electric companies are intended to create a huge network that will be marketing the utilities in question, with states opening D. company and electric company are intending to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question, with states opening E. company and leading electric company is intended to create a huge network for marketing the utilities in question as states open 这题选E，A里面的指代不清的问题讨论的比较清楚了。但是E里面for marketing表目的，是不是相对的不好呢，我当时直接用这条掐掉它了。 还有，with的用法我一直比较晕，因为它表达比较模糊，我一般就从句意上推断，只要句子有强烈的逻辑关系就先降序，而且句末的独立主格一般也省略with，所以我选的时候一般都降序考虑它。 这道题A有说法是with在句首才能表伴随，我觉得不太赞同。。。 livia姐有总结关于with的心得么，求解呀~~~  -- by 会员 蒙小灰 (2010/9/18 10:32:43)
亲爱的，其实这道题我觉得从句意和主谓一致上判断是最快的。我说说我的思路啊，
1.首先主句的主语是merger, 所以所有谓语是are的全部排除，只剩下A,E(爽吧？)
2.A,E我从句意上判断的，merger其实是融合，兼并的意思（如果不认识这个单词，也可从主句的内容大概推出来），既然如此，兼并必须是两个及以上的才能兼并，那么A选项的gas and electric company 有歧义，如果按照标准书面用法，说的就是一个公司，一个公司怎么能兼并呢？自然排除，就剩下E了。
关于with用法，我还真没什么心得。不过我最近总结语法确实有点儿心得，那就是出题趋势越来越偏重于逻辑意思。我个人觉得，当然也是因为我比较懒固定搭配记住的少哈，光靠固定搭配来排除的方法容易把我们引向错误的方向（因为毕竟不是母语，好多我们没见过，但其实是可以搭配的），主要从1.逻辑意思 2.修饰层次 3.硬性错误（主谓一致，指代等）来区分。
像你问的这道题，即使我们不知道merger的意思，也可以按照语义排除。因为A后面说的是to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question with states opening，E说的是to create a huge network for marketing the utilities in question as states open
按照逻辑推断，只有network是可以创造的，marketing是无法创造出来的，故A还是不对。
如果我没解释清楚，再问我哈。我就是用这种方法做语法滴~目前看来挺好用的
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
楼主
发表于 2010-9-18 10:35:45
