ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: cocoabean
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全117 - OG 56 请教help

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2008-12-1 23:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cammln在2007-2-24 16:12:00的发言:

还是不明白:

Architects and stonemasons是什么语法成分,是maya的同位语吗,怎么觉得同位语不应该这么用啊?

是同位语,只不过放在主语的前面,跟我们平时看到的不一样

12#
发表于 2009-10-5 20:40:00 | 只看该作者
请问楼主
1. A, B, and D illogically suggest that the
            palace and temple clusters were architects and stonemasons.
For the modification to be logical. Architects and stonemasons must immediately precede the Maya, the noun phrase it is meant to modify.

    


    


    3.?? E is awkwardly phrased and produces a sentence fragment,?? because the appositive noun phrase Architects and stonemasons cannot serve as the subject of were the Maya.
        
以偏代全.

这些解释从哪里来哈?
13#
发表于 2009-10-5 21:07:00 | 只看该作者
前置的同位语吧。
14#
发表于 2013-4-4 09:32:58 | 只看该作者
Again from Gmatclub:

C has to be the correct answer.

'Architects and stonemasons' is a modifier. The only ones that could be remotely close would be C and E.

Move it around a bit and you can see it clearer.

(C) the maya, [architects and stonemasons], built the huge palace and the temple clusters without the benifit of animal transport or the wheel

Since the modifier is placed in front the first thing after the comma should be what its modifying.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 01:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部