In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years.Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.
There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.
The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago. 答案为D,这道题也是OG12的87题,不过选项内容有变动。一直想不清楚,答案是怎么削弱的!希望牛人可以帮助解释一下,真诚感谢!
解释的很好啊,我也是错了两次,看来楼上的分析很明白,不过想了一下自己错的原因,也很大家分享下,就是原句的3%没有理解到比较的对象,也就是这个题目的迷惑点,如果把句子看成, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage ,of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired,就豁然开朗啦。