ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. After the fragments' entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3115|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 6月8号一战720,大家要对自己有信心

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-6-9 18:20:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
迟到的狗,自己记忆力真不好,对不起大家...

作文:
aa 一餐馆开在一小镇上,两年来盈利状况好。该小镇有许多大学,学生喜爱该餐馆的spicy sandwiches.餐馆老板准备再开三间新餐馆在附近地区并训练三个老员工作为managers。老板认为这样可以triple current profits.
ai a business leader has far more opportunities to influence the course of a community and a nation than does any government official.

逻辑
开始看到很多人说gmat逻辑很难,但这次我碰到的都还难度比较适中。
最诡异的是碰到了两道prep里做过的题目:一道是说一个地方meat&grain&income关系的支持题,还有一道是句子作用题 貌似是那个什么东西爆炸还是穿过了什么,atmosphere有没有sulfer的题。
其他的逻辑静下心应该没问题,唉,奈何我记忆力如此低下,至今还没回忆出一道新逻辑狗...

语法
语法...唉...个人感觉巨难...和prep的语法大相径庭(也可能只是个人感觉,但是真把我考懵了,)
靠语法给我的感觉就是做一道错一道,题目划线越来越短,可即使再短还是不会,心想完蛋了,自己肯定和低分厮守了,但结果还好,我也很意外,兄弟姐妹们看到短划线题也不要太绝望啊!
有道语法题是考某人说的表达
题目经简化后大概长成这样
“某人说话的内容” sb said.  
划线部分是考我们到底是sb said还是said sb  不知道的同学要注意下这种表达的顺序,唉,偶就不知道,嗯,看本人如此之烂的语法水平也能上700,兄弟姐妹们要对自己有信心啊!

阅读
四篇 首尾两篇短,中间两篇长
只记得一篇长的文章是讲一种bee
第一段:此bee强悍靠公bee传播花粉什么的,还说公bee采集花中的一种东西吸引异性吧
第二 三段:具体讲公bee如何吸引母bee.先靠该花中的那个东西吸引同种公bee,然后一群公bee larva什么的开始吵吧,然后母bee就过来了。
有问主旨的,有问推断的,嗯,感觉比较难吧,不好定位
还有一篇好像是短的
好像就一段,是说环保有难度吧,举例说是否该把物种多样性作为环境质量的判断依据之一。一般认为可以作为依据。但作者举了两个物种数量变多但环紧质量反而低的例子。
文章不难。

数学:
数学也是我考得比较诡异的地方,我数学50,自己数学底子不好,得到这个分数已经知足了。
诡异的地方在于ps完全简单题,真的毫不夸张,其中一道四分之一处以四分之五等于多少,唉,真是被藐视,再次强调,大家觉得数学简单题多不要绝望啊...
唯一两道代表性的狗
120是(n+2)!,(n+1)!,(n-1)!的最大公约数,求n.  就是算当(n-1)!=120时,n的值
集合a含5个数,集合b含7个数,集合b的median是否大于集合a的median
条件1:集合a的数均包含在集合b中
条件2:集合b的range大于集合b的range
我选e

考试之前发现许多人都奋斗了好多次还听说六月份的题目难所以有点对至此考试没信心,(连着几天都放弃既定的计划去看电视了),并且这次考试曾数次然我觉得自己跌入低分段(数学的ps弱智到我这种数学程度的人都感觉受鄙视,语法划线越来越短,逻辑还有prep中的原题),但结局是好的,同志们,一定要对自己有信心啊,不到最后不要放弃!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-6-9 18:26:17 | 只看该作者
楼主 真的鼓舞到我了~~加油~
板凳
发表于 2010-6-9 18:29:40 | 只看该作者
楼主~~我也6月8号考的~你做语法的感觉跟我一模一样!! 基本都没什么太长的SC题,还越做越短,即使短还觉得不会做!!选项各种具有迷惑性,跟做OG和Prep的感觉都不一样。
地板
发表于 2010-6-9 18:29:43 | 只看该作者
恭喜lz! 这句把我笑死了“和低分厮守了” 呵呵 我一战就是越做划线越短 结果就真的和低分厮守了。。。

谢谢狗狗

那个said sb那题。。到底选啥? gwd和prep好似都没有讲啊
5#
发表于 2010-6-9 18:44:20 | 只看该作者
恭喜lz个一站成功哇
求下确认。
41 GWD-29-Q28
Astronomer:  Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.  Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.  After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.  The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.  Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.
In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6#
发表于 2010-6-9 19:03:05 | 只看该作者
恩,要坚持到底
7#
发表于 2010-6-9 19:03:22 | 只看该作者
恩,要坚持到底,相信会有好结果的。
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-9 19:26:03 | 只看该作者
逻辑就是五楼的那道题。。。不过我到现在也不知道选什么
不知道我的意思表达清楚没有,总之大家坚持坚持再坚持  这么多战友们都奋斗着呢
唉...我的作文好差...还不知道要不要再战
不过我会努力的
我是比较悲观的那种,考前数次阶段性堕落和迷茫,不过我知道这条杀G路是正确的  
所以不要放弃  不要做只差一步的奥非欧
9#
发表于 2010-6-9 19:28:50 | 只看该作者
真的要加油~~和LZ一天考的~也是语法很懵~ 都看不到考点在哪里了。。。。我会再努力的!
10#
发表于 2010-6-9 19:29:53 | 只看该作者
谢谢lz啦。。额。。就是那个bf题。请问是那句标黑了哈。。
麻烦啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 02:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部