麻烦确认下的哈哈谢谢~ GWD1-Q18: It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except in professional medical journals or by mail directly to physicians. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that, in general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern. Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument? 问下lz的第五题那个是仍然是Gwd原题不？米有变体吧？ Whether nonprescription medications can interact with and block the action of any prescription medications that could be advertised to the general public Whether most prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would be advertisements for recently developed medications newly available by prescription Whether prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would appear on television and radio as well as in print Whether physicians are more likely to pay attention to advertising directed to the general public than to advertising directed to physicians Whether physicians are likely to succumb to pressure from patients to prescribe inappropriate medications 评价题的选项只有一个是和原文相关的；文中的结论是因为药师有最后开药的生杀大权,所以反对无效；选项中必然包含这样概念的句子啊。 -- by 会员 nowwsy (2010/6/2 18:32:31)
是变体。题干有变化，问得也不一样，不是evaluate, 好像是support还是assumption。选项全部换到完,但是都记不住了。我好像选了一个选项说可以替代很多non prescription要很多又便宜（记不太清，记忆模糊了） | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-6-2 18:31:31
楼主
发表于 2010-6-2 18:52:20
