求助GWD

sunfish223

GWD 31-- 18--Q28:

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

1. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
   
   
2. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
   
3. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
   
4. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
   
5. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
   

这道为什么选D呢 @@

gwd 31-18-Q20:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.That plan is ill-conceived:if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.



In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

1. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
   
2. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
   
   
3. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
   
4. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
   
5. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
   
   这道为什么也选D 呢
   
   请大侠们帮忙解决，谢谢！！！
   

gwd 31-18-Q20:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.That plan is ill-conceived:if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.



In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

1. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
   
2. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
   
   
3. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
   
4. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
   
5. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
   
   这道为什么也选D 呢
   
   请大侠们帮忙解决，谢谢！！！
   

sunfish223

牛牛们帮忙解决下吧 @@

洛洛洛洛

好多...
第一题，D说那些本来就存了长期存款的人把钱转到这个特殊的Account
这样的说，虽然这个SA是增加了，但是政府的目的是增加存款，这样总存款数目是不变的啊

第二题，先说下，我BF题很不擅长...
这里第一个黑体很明确，第二个不是作者支持的啊，第二个黑体后面就是个BUT。BUT前反后支啊，所以B肯定不对啊～D咯

第三题，原来梯三体和第二题一样呀～

sunfish223

赫赫 谢谢哦 粘的时候米注意 重复了