There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing. A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing. B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished. C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing. D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished. E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished. 这题不知道MM怎么分析的,我一直想不明白 -- by 会员 wei1 (2010/6/6 9:30:21)
这道题是选A吗? 这题考的是同类比较,非限定性定语从句,逻辑,句子结构。
A正确。there are for cod and haddock与There are no legal limits进行类比,句子形式对等,正确。A circumstancethat contributes to their depletion through overfishing是前面描述的情况的同位语,用来解释no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught是怎样的一种情况。
整个句子是:As there are no legal limits onthe size of catching for cod and haddock, thereare no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught,a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
B错误。Unlike引导的是将cod or haddock这两个名词与前面的句子进行对比,不对等,错误。并且,they指代不清晰。
C错误。整个句子的逻辑就错了啊,因为cod,haddock,monkfish的打捞量都是不合法的、没有限度的。Which修饰靠近的名词,这次修饰monkfish,错误。
D错误。将cod and haddock与nolegal size limits对比,不是同类。Which问题同C。
E错误。类比错误参考D。Contributing to修饰有歧义,是catching cod and haddock还是there are no legal sizelimits on catching monkfish导致的后果? |