北美五二零+740+gogo

monkeydjasmine

刚考完，一回家马上上网放狗狗！

首先要感谢CD和所有gogo整理者，没有你们我是绝对考不到这个分数的！真庆幸自己是中国人，我站在了巨人的肩膀上 ：）

因为学校功课太忙了，复习GMAT一直是断断续续的。大考结束和GMAT之间只有4天，大考前的几个礼拜都在复习功课，gmat连碰都没碰。这次的分数全靠gogo

数学遇到了很过狗，但还是只有49...我是个不合格的中国人。

语文阅读4篇全中，逻辑GOGO看了一般，碰到了1，2只，语法GOGO没看，所以不知道。

所以，近几天考的同学们，抓紧时间看gogo。

放狗狗几只：

作文：

A.a survey shows our customers now show a higher level of interest in eatinghealthy. so Foster and Health should expand its three gyms to include anorganic grocery store before national chains come in to take market share. by doing so, Foster and Health can increase its profit, which has beenthe same for the past several years

I.employers should have the right to prohibit employees from doing unhealthyactivities, both in work place and in private lives.

数学：

补充狗狗244    那题大意是说两个租车行，A是65一天，不限公里数，B是35一天，但超过100mile就得每0.16/mile的加上去。问租三天，B跑多少公里，才能和A收的钱一样多。

$0.16/miles 应该是 $0.2/miles. 还有题目中明确提到 “B每天跑的mile一样 ”所以正确的方程是 65={35+（X-100）0.2} , X为每天跑的miles. 最后X要乘上3，为3天一共跑的miles.

逻辑黑脸题：

科学家想要知道一个宇宙中fragment的重量。后面接了一些background information, which is not important。他们发现，在他们找到这些fragment 时候，这些fragment带有sulfur。可是，这些fragment本身是没有sulfer的。但这些sulfer在大气层里有。所以科学家门认为, those fragments are heavy enough to pass through 大气层。

我选的是第一个是a finding that the scientist uses as an implication, 第二个是what the first oneimplies.

语法：

Although bat is not uncommon in [some kind ofplace]-it rarely leaves a certain range-their small population decreasedeven further. [大该是这么个structure]

大家选有“its”的选项就好了，错的都是用their。这题我犹豫了很久，觉得错误不应该这么明显。大家考试的再琢磨琢磨。

祝所有同学杀G成功！

mermaidww

恭喜LZ，感谢!

pighappy

是这个BF题吗？

Astronomer:  Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.  Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.  After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.  The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.  Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.    The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
B.    The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
C.    The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
D.    The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
E.    The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

monkeydjasmine

是这个BF题吗？

Astronomer:  Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.  Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.  After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.  The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.  Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.    The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
B.    The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
C.    The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
D.    The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
E.    The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

-- by 会员 pighappy (2010/5/21 12:02:06)

BINGO. 题目一模一样。但选项不同。黑脸的地方已标出