ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville. The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded. Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because __________.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 13614|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助prep上一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-30 19:40:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Twenty percent of the stores in Morganville's downtown shopping district will fail within five years because they will be competing directly with the SaveMart discount department store newly opened in East Morganville. The downtown shopping district has lost business at this rate before and has always completely rebounded. Confidence that it will rebound again from the losses it is now about to suffer is ill founded, however, because ________ .


1. the stores like to be put out of business by direct competition from SaveMart are the downtown shopping district's anchor stores, on whose ability to draw shoppers many of the other downtown stores depend.
2. the bus line that has long connected the downtown are of Morganville with EastMorganville has a tradition of carrying shoppers who reside in EastMorganville into downtown Morganville to shop.
3. when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of same kind as had been there before
4. SaveMart's business plan for the EastMorgalvill store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence.
5. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether
答案为1,请教各位大侠,题目的意思。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-1 11:14:15 | 只看该作者
啊呀。。。。顶一下我也错了,不过A选项是the stores likely..哈~~唤NN~~现身吧
现在我是这样想的:

题:20%要关了,因为东边开了个新的打折店;以前也按这个20%的比例倒闭过但是都rebound了,所以这次还会rebound. 问weaken.

A the stores likely to be put out of business by direct competition from SaveMart are the downtown shopping district's anchor stores, on whose ability to draw shoppers many of the other downtown stores depend.
anchor stores是主力商店。这个主力商店能为其他的downtown商店吸引客户。看来以前这个AS存在的时候,其他的商店也都借力于它,现在他由于打折店的开张要倒闭了,那其他的商店也跟着完蛋了。因此rebound很难。削弱。
B the bus line that has long connected the downtown area of Morganville with East Morganville has a tradition of carrying shoppers who reside in East Morganville into downtown Morganville to shop
支持有车接客人来,会rebound
C. when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind as had been there before 不明白这个选项呢。。。谁来解释一下,我选了C。rebound的店是和原来的店一个类形的。是因为我们不知道将被关的店是什么类型所以这个选项对结论的作用没法判断吗?
D. SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence无关吧?
E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关



E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关


D. SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence无关吧?
E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关



E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关


板凳
发表于 2010-5-11 15:50:12 | 只看该作者
顶!!
地板
发表于 2010-5-30 14:06:19 | 只看该作者
啊呀。。。。顶一下我也错了,不过A选项是the stores likely..哈~~唤NN~~现身吧
现在我是这样想的:

题:20%要关了,因为东边开了个新的打折店;以前也按这个20%的比例倒闭过但是都rebound了,所以这次还会rebound. 问weaken.

A the stores likely to be put out of business by direct competition from SaveMart are the downtown shopping district's anchor stores, on whose ability to draw shoppers many of the other downtown stores depend.
anchor stores是主力商店。这个主力商店能为其他的downtown商店吸引客户。看来以前这个AS存在的时候,其他的商店也都借力于它,现在他由于打折店的开张要倒闭了,那其他的商店也跟着完蛋了。因此rebound很难。削弱。
B the bus line that has long connected the downtown area of Morganville with East Morganville has a tradition of carrying shoppers who reside in East Morganville into downtown Morganville to shop
支持有车接客人来,会rebound
C. when the downtown shopping district has rebounded before, the business premises of a failed business were typically taken over by a business of the same kind as had been there before 不明白这个选项呢。。。谁来解释一下,我选了C。rebound的店是和原来的店一个类形的。是因为我们不知道将被关的店是什么类型所以这个选项对结论的作用没法判断吗?
D. SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence无关吧?
E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关



E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关


D. SaveMart's business plan for the East Morganville store is based on earning low profits, if any, during the first five years of the store's existence无关吧?
E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关



E. it is conceivable that the downtown shopping district could shrink substantially without collapsing altogether无关


-- by 会员 gracezz (2010/5/1 11:14:15)



我跟你错的一样么。。我做的时候AC犹豫了很久,都快心虚了。后来觉得C很像正确答案的标志,因为有“以前反弹是因为。。。”这种格式。结果还是错了。。。我现在看C是说以前反弹的企业,失败的先决条件是被别的公司吞了。感觉是无关项。只有A强调了重要性,有那么点加强作用。我觉得这道题好反常啊。。。。考试的时候碰到这种反常提醒怎么办。呜。。。
5#
发表于 2010-9-10 07:05:33 | 只看该作者
我认为C是加强,如果以前倒闭的店被同类型的店接管的话,应该是rebound的.
6#
发表于 2011-8-5 17:16:09 | 只看该作者
题目是在说整个"district" fail,C选项:如果同类的店继续take over的话,那个district就不会fail了,
做错的朋友,是不是搞错了 individual store 的 fail 和整个 district的fail?
7#
发表于 2011-9-28 13:39:24 | 只看该作者
8#
发表于 2011-11-21 15:21:39 | 只看该作者
C:会被接管,但是他并没有解释说接管的企业是好是坏,那怎么能够推论的出他可以rebounded? 或者suffer is ill founded.
A: 阐明了它们的主要经济来源...代表会rebounded
不知这样是否可以解释?
9#
发表于 2013-5-26 09:20:02 | 只看该作者
uibeantares 发表于 2011-9-28 13:39
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/twenty-percent-of-the-stores-in-morganville-s-downtown-t9047.htm ...

这个帖子挺好,很细致的解答了这个问题,说说我看完后的想法吧。
1、侧面说明了,寂静是把双刃剑!这个题跟OG一道很有争议的题很类似,但是考点完全不同。那道题考的是类比削弱,在类比两个例子,答案是找出这个两个例子有不同点,所以结果不能完全类似。我第一开始选了C,就是受到那个题目的影响。
寂静这东西,看过以后,用不用就不是自己能掌握的了。多少有点印象,大脑都会先入为主的掌控我们的思维。
2、回到问题本身,这个题目问的是原因,我们是要根据已知去寻找原因的,所以找到一个可以顺利解释conclusion的就好。那么就是,如果这次受影响最大的将会倒闭的商店都是旗舰店的话,而且这些旗舰店也是很多其他小店的顶梁柱招财猫的话,他们都到了,其他的喽啰们的死期也就“指日可待了”。
当你知道这个题问什么的时候,再看其他的都是无关选项了。
希望能有帮助!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 01:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部