ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4067|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-17-1-4 选项的意思不明白。谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-5-20 06:45:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-17-1-4 选项的意思不明白。谢谢!

Test17-SECTION 1
4. The Theory of military deterrence was based on a simple psychological truth, that fear of retaliation makes a would-be aggressor nation hesitate before attacking and is often sufficient to deter it altogether from attacking. Clearly, then, to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to be believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred?

(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks.
(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation.
(C) One nation's failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation.
(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack.
(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.

不明白答案D的含义。分析:国家利益(?)原文没有提到过,unsurpassed原文似乎也没有说?这个D好像最应该排除 ;)



沙发
发表于 2003-5-20 10:21:00 | 只看该作者
“retaliatory power so great”  that " it could not defend itself against such retaliation"就是说has unsurpassed military power。 而且 in the country's interest 不一定就是这具体的国家利益。 它是说 符合这个国家的利益。或者简单说就是对这个国家有利
板凳
发表于 2003-5-20 10:38:00 | 只看该作者
我做完了17套。。
17III 35分钟, 错10
17IV 35分钟, 错11
你这套题我也错了。
地板
发表于 2003-5-20 10:47:00 | 只看该作者
同意mike的看法。。但是在快速做题的时候如果没细想,很容易把它排除。。因为它长得很不象。。我也做错了这道题。
5#
发表于 2003-5-21 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
为什么E是错的,请帮助解答
6#
发表于 2003-5-21 23:42:00 | 只看该作者
原文是说:A国只要报复的打击>B国所能抵挡的力量。。则A国对B国就有威慑力。
E讲的是有威慑力的条件是:A国家报复的力量>B国家报复的力量。。比较的方式和原文不同
7#
发表于 2003-5-22 00:15:00 | 只看该作者
此题用排除法可以很快得到答案.

A,C错在原文中deterence是充分条件, AC中变成了必要条件.
B,E原文没有relaliatory power的比较.
D中的interest是common sense. 不被侵略当然是national interest.
8#
发表于 2003-5-22 01:06:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢以上两位!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-21 09:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部