请教大全5-15，没问过的

ellie78

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?
(A) Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.
(B) Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.
(C) If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and the general public.
(D) There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.
(E) Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.
正选是A。盼达人指点迷津~

hughlv

这道题是要找出一个最充足的理由来证明私营的环保公司无法做好国家公园的保护，从而削弱建议。

A. 那些想滥用森林资源的人会趁这个机会加入到私营的环保公司，并最终获得领导权。言外之意就是他们到时候可以想怎么滥用就怎么滥用，从而破坏森林。所以这是一个很强的理由起削弱作用。
B. 这一点无法起到削弱或者加强作用。即使最后的决策不是最优化的，如果比国有的好那就可以起到加强作用了。
C. 私营公司可能在某方面需要寻求帮助。无关选项。
D. 无关选项。因为无法得出competition的结果是对公园好还是不好。
E. 有些物种可能灭绝，即使这些私营公司再努力也不行。这一点无法说明私营公司不好，因此无法削弱或者加强。