ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The proposal to hire 10 new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3639|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求帮忙分析 :old prep cr2-58

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-13 11:10:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
58.        (33711-!-item-!-188;#058&007588)


Theproposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish.  There is sufficient funding to pay thesalaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court andprison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictionsthat new officers usually generate.

Whichof the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawnabove?

(A)Studies have shown that an increase in a city's police force does notnecessarily reduce crime.
(B)When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year, therewere 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.
(C)If funding for the new police officers' salaries is approved, support for othercity services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
(D)In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and notall convictions result in prison terms.(E)
(E)Middletown's ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at whichan increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime.
我的问题是:

我理解的是文中的 conclusion是:Theproposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish,

原因是:There is sufficient funding to pay thesalaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court andprison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictionsthat new officers usually generat。
照我这样的理解思路答案是D,可是文中答案是E,我却认为E是加强了结论。我知道我的思路肯定是错了,可是怎么也拐不到正确的答案上去。求指点!!!


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-14 21:47:26 | 只看该作者
E的意思是Middletown警察和市民的比例,已经到达了可以制止犯罪的数量了。所以就算增加了薪水,警察需要办的案件也不会增加,所以,增加薪水是徒劳
板凳
发表于 2010-4-16 15:28:57 | 只看该作者
这题不是说得结论的问题。说的是一个因果关系:
因为增加了警员但没提高逮捕和认罪数量,所以增加警员是愚蠢行为。

D应该是无关选项。
E说得是这么做不是愚蠢的,用处是增加威慑力。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-17 14:08:50 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上的分析,好像有点明白了!
5#
发表于 2012-2-3 11:55:45 | 只看该作者
Theproposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish.  There is sufficient funding to pay thesalaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court andprison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictionsthat new officers usually generate.

题意说的因果关系应该是
增加警察了工资就要增加,但是额外增加的案子引起的花费又不够付吧????还是不明白,求各位大牛再看一眼这个题,求解答!!
6#
发表于 2012-2-3 11:59:10 | 只看该作者
粗心了,D选项说的是In most United States cities,而不是Middletown.
7#
发表于 2012-2-3 12:00:35 | 只看该作者
E的意思是Middletown警察和市民的比例,已经到达了可以制止犯罪的数量了。所以就算增加了薪水,警察需要办的案件也不会增加,所以,增加薪水是徒劳
-- by 会员 minnieche (2010/4/14 21:47:26)


是这个原因
8#
发表于 2013-7-15 18:24:58 | 只看该作者
米米时代007 发表于 2012-2-3 11:59
粗心了,D选项说的是In most United States cities,而不是Middletown.

米米的观点是D错在in most united states,我觉得很有道理,同时我还想,是不是因为D说并不是每一个arrest都会导致conviction,但是既然会增加arrest,那么funding就不会够,就起不到削弱观点的作用。
9#
发表于 2015-11-2 15:33:41 | 只看该作者
E选项的意思是,随着new officier人数的增加,对犯罪会起到一个威慑作用。 如果E选项成立,那就不需要付薪水给原文中提到的额外的prison employees,所以削弱了原假设。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-11 14:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部