ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. After the fragments' entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8582|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-29-Q28 看看这道以前的争议题现在有没有新的看法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-12 23:15:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
41 GWD-29-Q28
Astronomer:Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.

B.The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.

C.The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.

D.The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.

E.The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

答案是C,但是有人说Prep上的答案是D,而我当时选的是E。也有人认为应该选E的。
之前的讨论:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-252976-1-1.html
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-12 23:32:45 | 只看该作者
还是选C,第一句话是circumstance,从第二句话到it is前都是为it is引领的结论做铺垫的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-13 09:43:08 | 只看该作者
自己想通了。主要是纠结于一些名词,总觉得第一个BF应该是evidence,现在觉得称之为consideration也没什么问题。
地板
发表于 2011-8-31 23:36:11 | 只看该作者
请问Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.是那个C项中所支持的主要观点吗??
5#
发表于 2018-7-27 22:12:08 | 只看该作者
D肯定不对的,第二个粗体是premise,它后面那句才是conclusion
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 11:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部