OG11-60 (E選項)

Kath1985

The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise
their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the
lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one
against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than
if the state retains its current restrictions.

60. If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?



(A)Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.



(B)More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.



(C)If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.



(D)If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.



(E)If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.
答案C  想問黃色部分such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, 的意思是 ?

是指其中一條法律禁止刊登廣告服務價錢嗎 ? 不懂one這裡指誰  求整句話翻譯  

hughlv

如果没有专门针对律师服务行业的法制限制，那么律师们就会踊跃做广告。

这个选项似乎很不搭界。

Kath1985

提出新問題 待解惑...

prayer

the one指的是any of its current restrictions；

peter3008

这道题目是OG 10的weaken题目，在OG11变成must to true题型了.承认文章的逻辑推理：
1。限制少---做广告的律师多 2。做广告的律师（打某一类广告）----收费少
条件结论：取消任意限制-----律师费用少 such as 只是举例 one of 限制，所以取消了这个such as所说的东西，那么费用就降低了，在考试的时候，不需要知道这个东东，只要确认是否为包含关系。