ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 10819|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请问:OG12 100题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-8 06:25:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
100. One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial  practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices. any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against

companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:





(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.




(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.


(D) Managers are generally more receptive to newideas that they find outside their own industry.





(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that takeadvantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.


答案是E,说实话我连题目问的是什么都没看懂,能不能高人指点一下。










收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-8 09:42:34 | 只看该作者
第一部分是benchmarking的定义。问题是为什么应该与无竞争关系的公司做比较,而非与有直接竞争关系的公司比。

理解了题目后应该做起来就会比较简单了,E是讲跟其他行业的公司比没有什么意义,因为公司的成功与其所在的特定环境密切相关。所以是个削弱项。
板凳
发表于 2010-4-8 09:42:49 | 只看该作者
把问题重新翻译一下:

“下面的哪一项不是一个有效的理由让一家公司来跟并非竞争对手的公司进行performance 比较”
地板
发表于 2010-4-8 09:45:13 | 只看该作者
问题里有个except, 所以你讲的几乎是对的,就是加个except。
5#
发表于 2010-4-8 10:58:14 | 只看该作者
那么理由很简单:
题目既然是:一下哪个选项不是支持benchmarking的理由,这个理由是基于非竞争情况的。那么,无论是支持还是反驳,必须要相关。既然要相关就要讨论非竞争情况,从A-D都是讨论竞争对手。所以统统是无关选项。只剩下E,我们也就不要纠结是支持还是反对了。
6#
发表于 2010-4-8 11:00:12 | 只看该作者
题目中的except就是让你找出不能对观点起support的项,e是削弱项自然也就是非support项了。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-8 11:15:59 | 只看该作者
对,就是题目看得有点晕啊
8#
发表于 2010-7-18 10:32:20 | 只看该作者
不过对于D项还是有点疑问,这个选项我个人感觉并没有与竞争关系的公司比较,已经不再是own industry 了,求解答
9#
发表于 2010-8-26 00:30:09 | 只看该作者
不过对于D项还是有点疑问,这个选项我个人感觉并没有与竞争关系的公司比较,已经不再是own industry 了,求解答
-- by 会员 云南 (2010/7/18 10:32:20)

經理一般都樂於接受行業外的新思想 是對 對比行業外 的命題的加強項 所以不是答案呀
10#
发表于 2010-10-23 20:39:20 | 只看该作者
这个题目问的乍一看真唬人  多念几遍其实很简单的意思
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 15:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部