ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4061|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep1-第98题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-4 14:32:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
98.    (32682-!-item-!-188;#058&006783)    (GWD 28-Q29)

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.
B. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa.
C. The bottom of the lake does not contain toxic remnants of earlier pollution that will be stirred into the water by pipeline construction.
D. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.
E. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.


答案是C

请问A和B为什么错了?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-5 01:12:49 | 只看该作者
相对来说,C取非后非常明显地削弱了题干
板凳
发表于 2011-7-11 00:11:44 | 只看该作者
这个题我选的是B。。因为我觉得措施的关键是内个technology会不会让污染物泄漏爱。。求高人指点~~~
地板
发表于 2011-7-11 08:44:42 | 只看该作者
我也错选了B诶。后来我看到有人说是因为那个BELIEVE不对。。
5#
发表于 2011-7-11 11:11:41 | 只看该作者

为神马believe不对类

为神马类?。。削弱不够强哞O.O
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 10:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部