Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early buyers apparently lost interest in obtaining videos to watch on it. The trade of businesses selling and renting videos is still buoyant, because the number of homes with video recorders is still growing. But clearly, once the market for video recorders is saturated, businesses distributing videos face hard times. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above? (A) The market for video recorders would not be considered saturated until there was one in 80 percent of homes. (B) Among the items handled by video distributors are many films specifically produced as video features. (C) Few of the early buyers of video recorders raised any complaints about performance aspects of the new product. (D) The early buyers of a novel product are always people who are quick to acquire novelties,but also often as quick to tire of them. (E) In a shrinking market, competition always intensifies and marginal businesses fail. 首先抱歉,我没按规定格式提问,我不记得是那部分的题了。 正确答案是D,为什么? 我对这段话的理解是:录像机市场饱和了-->录像带销售商就没好日子了。因此我觉得D是个无关选项。
以下是引用JerryGuan在2004-4-3 13:39:00的发言: 我的理解是这样的,不知对否: D答案是否定了:once the market for video recorders is saturated “一旦市场达到了饱和。。。。” D说:很多喜欢新东西的主儿,还会买新东西,所以,对不起,这个市场达不到饱和,不要再推理了。 NN指点。