ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2298|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PUZZLED!!!!HELP

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-6 18:34:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?





The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  roponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
i
t is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
为什么C是错的,。。。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-6 20:53:23 | 只看该作者
irradiation作用就是杀菌  并不能烧熟食物。 而cooking可以烧熟。
文章说他误导了人,拿irradiation 和cooking两种方式比较了VB的剩余量,从而说irradiation和cooking没什么不好好的。            

但 比较法的 前提 是参照物物在同一基础上,我们才能比较。 也就说比较的东西要 都是生的,或都是熟的。这样才能比。  因此 说他误导了人。 而放到同一基础上比较的结果 就是 辐照过的 而且烧熟的食物 VB大大减少。


C选项其实也不错。但我觉得 针对 misleading 这个字眼 ,即要从 支持辐照者  的逻辑上来攻击它,C选项有点间接。。因此选E

我自己的一点看法。。不知道能被接受不。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 02:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部