Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?
Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.
Which of the following, if true, most seriouslyundermines the journalist's argument?
A. Every article based on experiments withparticle accelerators that was submitted forpublication last year actually was published.
B.The average time scientists must wait foraccess to a particle accelerator has declinedover the last several years.
C.The number of physics journals was the same last year as in previous years.
D.Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.
E.Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle?accelerator research will be accepted for
A 项只说明所提交的论文都发表了,但是并没有涉及具体论文数量的多少。常规来说,仪器维修期肯定会影响实验次数继而影响论文的提交数量,所有提交的论文都发表了,总数量还是减少了。如果这样理解A项显然就是间接增强了结论而不是减弱。 E 项的策略调整从另一个客观情况解释了期刊减少的原因。如果要深究,E项中有点迷惑的就是这个“RECENT”的时间界限。