ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2813|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-86 (A選項沒人問過)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-1 16:26:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG11-86

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.


Which of the following, if true, most seriouslyundermines the journalist's argument?

A.  Every article based on experiments withparticle accelerators that was submitted forpublication last year actually was published.
   
B.The average time scientists must wait foraccess to a particle accelerator has declinedover the last several years.

C.The number of physics journals was the same last year as in previous years.

D.Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.

E.Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle?accelerator research will be accepted for

答案為E  
A說去年每個關於Accelerator都被出版  但我不明白A錯在哪  也看不懂OG的解釋 懇請牛牛們解惑 感恩
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-2 01:46:58 | 只看该作者
A在我看来是个无关选项。A的意思是去年论文的通过率100%,而问题中的结论为去年发表的文章数量低的原因是离子加速器比较少。多少与通过率之间并没有直接的strengthen/weaken关系。E则是为数量低找了另外一个理由,这样子文中的结论就不一定成立了。
板凳
发表于 2010-3-2 12:58:33 | 只看该作者
A 项只说明所提交的论文都发表了,但是并没有涉及具体论文数量的多少。常规来说,仪器维修期肯定会影响实验次数继而影响论文的提交数量,所有提交的论文都发表了,总数量还是减少了。如果这样理解A项显然就是间接增强了结论而不是减弱。
E 项的策略调整从另一个客观情况解释了期刊减少的原因。如果要深究,E项中有点迷惑的就是这个“RECENT”的时间界限。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-9 22:35:00 | 只看该作者
過了一個月 回頭複習 忽然開竅了 多謝兩位
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 15:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部