作文:考前没看,考场胡写。。原题帮大家找到了A“Over the past decade, the price per pound of citrus fruit has increased substantially. Eleven years ago, Megamart charged 5 cents apiece for lemons, but today it commonly charges over 30 cents apiece. In only one of these last eleven years was the weather unfavorable for growing citrus crops. Evidently, then, citrus growers have been responsible for the excessive increase in the price of citrus fruit, and strict pricing regulations are needed to prevent them from continuing to inflate prices.” 2. “It is unrealistic to expect individual nations to make, independently, the sacrifices necessary to conserve energy. International leadership and worldwide cooperation are essential if we expect to protect the world’s energy resources for future generations.”
vebal: 全都是语法。。至少20道。。。至今崩溃中。。。同志们语法是王道啊!!!!! 考了not only , as well as, like对比,including....还是选which什么什么。。。语法很烂的大牛们不用参考我的了。。。还有破折号和冒号大家看下用法
楼主辛苦了 ,回忆了这么多,裸牛! 我找到了恐龙的考古,辛苦楼主帮忙确认下,谢谢了: 第一段讲以前考古学家对恐龙的灭绝有兴趣,但最近(好像是221 million years ago,有考点,但我忘了考什么了)兴趣逐渐转移到了恐龙出现的时候(有细节题) 第二段恐龙出现的时候,一些爬行动物灭绝了,有科学家认为是恐龙的到来使它们灭绝的;但也有科学家认为恐龙到来了很久以后它们才灭绝,所以不是恐龙的到来造成它们的灭绝。于是,一种理论认为是气候变化导致的爬行动物灭绝,讲了很多,最后被作者找了个原因毙了。[作者否定了] 第三段讲另一些科学家认为是陨石撞击地球使它们灭绝的;举了个例子,在加拿大魁北克发现的陨石坑形成的年代和爬行动物灭绝的时间吻合(细节题:问举这个例子in order to?我选的D,就是承认撞击的年代和爬行动物灭绝的年代吻合,E选项很迷惑,是说为了说明是陨石撞击造成爬行动物灭绝,我犹豫了一会儿,认为还是选D, 毕竟作者观点是不同意陨石撞击说的);接下来继续说这种理论,但也被作者找了个理由给毙了。[作者也否定了] 第四段讲作者态度,他认为不应该简单的接受某一种观点,而应该综合考虑这个complex的问题,考了作者态度题