ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2211|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep逻辑请教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-25 14:13:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.



The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that



(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available

(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals

(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering

(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer

(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
请问这题为什么选择c呢?感觉e好像也是对的。。。
谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-3-28 21:00:08 | 只看该作者
同问啊,选E为什么不行呢?高桌子把视线都挡了,还怎么看明星呢?
板凳
发表于 2012-3-28 22:45:56 | 只看该作者
这道题不是weaken...而是argument中的flaw

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

把E代到问题中去就完全反了

premise:many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.
Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.

conclusion:Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

顾客为了看明星喜欢高桌子&在高桌子上吃饭顾客呆的时间更短(这里面就有flaw:顾客坐高桌子的主要目的不是吃饭而是看明星,那么在桌子上呆的时间不是更长么?)所以应该是C
it gives reason to believe that it is likely that a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-1 06:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部