CXD逻辑20,N哥请进!

gedn01

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.

答案稍后给

mycontrol01

A 不加强也不削弱  
B 无关...即使大公司要资助, 只要剧院不收资助就完了,节目还是由剧院定.
C 如果剧院削减预算就只能表演最有名的剧本的话, 那么剧院拒绝公司赞助的唯一结果就是只表演最有名的剧本达   不到预期目的.如此就反驳了结论   选C
D 只是陈述事实,不加强也不削弱
E 无关 是否能和公司赞助一样并不影响,  而且剧院已经决定削减预算