ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4935|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

CXD逻辑31,N哥请进!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-20 15:46:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
If the statements in the passage are true, which of the following must be true?
A. Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.  
B.  More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal service.  
C.If the restriction against advertisement that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.  
D. If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.  
E. If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.
我相信这已经是比较经典的题了,但我还认为D比答案C要合适
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-2-20 18:06:27 | 只看该作者
这道题在OG12里也有,文章中有一句话overall consumer legal costs will be lower。我们可以推测,整体费用下降的原因可能有两个,一是做广告的律师降低费用,而是不做广告的律师降低费用。从题目中我们可以明显看出 the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually
charge less ,所以优先选C而非D


The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there
are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually
charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state
removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do
not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the
state retains its current restrictions.
If the statements in the passage are true, which of the following must be true?
A. Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.  
B.  More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal service.  
C.If the restriction against advertisement that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.  
D. If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.  
E. If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.
我相信这已经是比较经典的题了,但我还认为D比答案C要合适
-- by 会员 gedn01 (2010/2/20 15:46:26)
板凳
发表于 2010-6-23 14:46:02 | 只看该作者
我觉的这个题确实应该选D。问题处在题干中的"must"上。如果要使整体的律师费用下降,我们不一定非要要求那些不做广告的律师也降价。比如,如果这些,没有做广告的律师保持他们的价格不变那么总体的价格依然会下降。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-23 06:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部