GWD-23-Q39 非常非常疑惑 一度怀疑答案给错了

kimpossible

In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania’s annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.All health care in Gandania is government-funded.

B.Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.

C.The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.

D.Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.

E.No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.


答案给的是A  可是我觉得B比较像

kimpossible

各路大侠 ~~~~~~

x_fan

前提：限制烟草——〉健康
结论：限制烟草——〉收入下降

因为是削弱，所以正确答案要使得
健康 不等于 收入下降
能够满足的只有A了，他在说如果人们健康了政府的收入会上升。

x_fan

B由于没谈到健康所以用无关法可以排除

franklvstudy

个人觉得是A啊
根据A的意思，人们吸烟少了，健康问题少了。

所以，虽然Gandania的profit会有所下降，但是政府所花出去的healthcare的钱也少了。

就weaken the argument了。。