答案是A,没错的。统计样本的问题。引用Manhattan的Ron的解释给你看。
basically, here's what going on here.
* the passage has noticed a CORRELATION between volunteerism and long life.
* the passage is questioning the notion that volunteerism CAUSES longer life.
takeaway: in any passage that takes CORRELATION and concludes CAUSATION, that connection can be destroyed if either: (a) the causation actually runs the other way around (i.e., the passage concludes that X causes Y, but in actuality Y causes X); (b) the two correlated things are both results of some third, not considered, confounding factor.
as an example of (b): there is a strong correlation between the # of churches and the # of murders in american cities: the more churches, the more murders. however, there is no causation at work here (churches don't cause murders, and murders don't cause the building of churches), because both of these factors are caused by a third factor: the SIZE of the city. (IE larger cities have both more churches and more murders.)
--
in this case, the sex of the volunteers is the "third, not considered, thing" that destroys the hypothesis of causal connection between volunteerism and long life.
hope that helps.
|