OG12 91请教各位！

猪小王

说说我的理解，请NN指正。
E - Environmentlist; C - The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority

P1: C的观点 － increases in the number of marine fish caught --> this resources is no longer endangered

IC: This is a specious argument 说明E不同意C，use an analogy to point out C's false: the increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut --> a lack of danger to that resource， 类似于某人每个月花20万，就能得出这个人一定能合法赚钱（不一定，可能是靠骗钱度日呢）

P2: E给出解释real cause is using tech to increase the efficiency in catching fish （类似于揭晓答案，此人到底如何弄到这么多钱)

虽然E揭晓了fishing数量增加的原因，但这不是E的conclusion。E的main conclusion是认为C不对，the resource of marine fish is still endangered. （类似于我们最后的结论是此人没有合法的赚钱能力）

(A) The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of peopleon nature. [exaggerate the topic in issue, and the topic in issue is about marine fishing]

(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered resource.[yes, this is the main point of the environmentalist]