ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2682|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12----43题 求助!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-22 20:57:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to
Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more
than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most
that
can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption[ on which the argument depends?

(A)  Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.

(B)  Northern Power can choose from among various kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more
effective
than others.

(C) Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.

(D) Harmful emissions from Northern Power's plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods
together
than by the installation of scrubbers alone.

(E) Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plantsrthe activities of Northern Power do
not
cause significant air pollution.

答案是D,我明白。
但是og中对C的解释是:even if the company is fully committed to reducing harmful emissions,it could be that installing scrubbers is the most it can do to reduce harmfule emissions.
我不明白选项C和它的解释有什么逻辑关系,怎么转都绕不明白,求解!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-23 22:45:22 | 只看该作者
C说的是没必要减排
注意这个是假设题,也就是结论必须建立在这个基础上
OG的解释就是说即使需要减排,也不影响结论,也就是说这个条件可以不要,所以就不能作为假设了
板凳
发表于 2012-3-13 10:45:42 | 只看该作者
同求。。。。。
地板
发表于 2012-3-13 15:46:41 | 只看该作者
C取非,就是NP有必要减排。和原文结论不矛盾。所以不是ASSUMPTION
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 22:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部