- UID
- 358677
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-16
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
william_acca: That is an example of why you shouldn't believe everything you hear. Most people can only tell you about what worked for them, or for others whom they know. In the universe of b-school applications (thousands and thousands of applications every year), that's a very small and insignificant number.
What matters most is the quality of applicant, and your personal readiness. When I applied to the Lauder programme I was the only student that they had ever taken in that had come straight out of a college education that was not Wharton. But if I had listened to others I wouldn't have applied, and wouldn't have gotten in.
Having said that, different schools have different policies. Wharton is very open to reapplicants; HBS less so. If you're worried, perhaps skip HBS for now.
JUDAL> Don't get fixated on "chronological correctness". Rather, go by "story importance". Leave in the facts necessary to demonstrate the difficulty of the situation, and the action that you executed (making sure to include analysis of WHY you did that) to solve it. The end of the essay, the result, should take up the least space. After all, results can only be accomplishments or failures. Your accomplishments should already be on your resume; your failures are not things you want to dwell too much on. (BTW, this is the SAR framework- situation, action, result).
To cut down on the words, remove the flowery descriptions that simply take up space and frankly, have no business being on a business memo. For example, "the situation was tense. My heart was racing. We needed to complete this in three hours." can be shortened to, "We had only three hours- too little."
In general, leave out the feelings, opinions, and so on, and let the facts of the situation speak for itself when you are describing the situation. The situation is merely there to show how challenging of a problem you faced, nothing more. No feelings should come attached to such descriptions, because everyone can recognise a challenging problem if you describe it clearly and concisely.
When you are analysing your actions, you can and should bring in more of your own thoughts. Always make sure to answer "why" you chose this course of action. The way to think of answering this is as follows: Answer this question. "There are a million possible courses of action. Analyse the situation like a talented and accomplished manager would, showing how you came to the conclusion that this action, and not some other course of action, is the appropriate one."
This should be the meat of your essay. They want mainly to see your thought process, to understand that your accomplishments did not come by 'by luck'. Rather, they want to see that you are analytical, logical and reasonable. While you (and everyone else) will always make mistakes and fail, by virtue of your talent, you will have a higher success rate than others. |
|