超级求助OG12第19篇文章，错好多啊！！

imJoanie

楼上的楼上更有说服力

cmmht2

105题
我也觉得不可能串段，我用line21-23周围的信息推出答案。
题目中说的是 a study limited to patients的优点
首先，更多的病人有more representative的结果，
接下来就是与前句相反的意思:Often researchers restrict study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied.通常，研究者会把研究案例限制在除所研究病例外没有其它病情的病人中。
A treatment judged successful under these ideal conditions can then be evaluated under normal conditions.
红字successful，ideal代表正面意义，为什么ideal就是因为不用考虑变量
evaluated under normal conditions.与c选项 when evaluating the treatment under study也差不多，所以我选C

其实OG答案更简单易懂：抓住题目与FM提议内容相反的关键
后文说了FM的提议 ：Broadening the range of trial participants,Frazier and Mosteller suggest, would enable researchers to evaluate atreatment’s efficacy for diverse patients under various conditions and toevaluate its effectiveness for different patient subgroups.
与之相反就是C选项的内容

bobopigangle

第一题，为什么E这个选项是错的

elevenly1011

求教各位nn这篇文章是不是涉及accuracy？99题a选项，100题e选项，101题a选项和103题的b选项都谈到了accurate的问题，但都是错误的。而且103题b选项og的解释说：the passage makes no judgment about the accuracy of the information collected by researchers who currently hold clinical trials.

其实我觉得挺多research的文章其实并没有谈到accuracy，而选项也把accuracy定为干扰选项..不知道这个总结对不对呢...

q635058726

up        up         up

q635058726

lunvs 发表于 2012-11-5 20:26
为了防止有人搜索到这个帖子重蹈覆辙。。楼上的楼上的说法有问题。答案不是出自第一段最后一句：Only in re ...

顶这个答案!  希望后来的小伙伴不要被其他答案误导了 这个楼里好几个分析有问题的

masaki006

同问第一题的e

claireevvv

同错3个，这篇文章完全把我弄糊了

K先生的小情人

第三题还是看的云里雾里。

学海无涯学学学

为了防止有人搜索到这个帖子重蹈覆辙。。楼上的楼上的说法有问题。答案不是出自第一段最后一句：Only in research on entirely new treatments are new and unexpected variables likely to arise.
先分析下文章结构：
1.F and M assert that...currently..although
2.F and M propose not only.. but also..often..F and M suggest ..
全文主要说明F和M提出要对clinical trials进行larger，simpler的改进。当前研究员对单体病人收集的背景信息太多而对整体更多类型的病人纳入临床实验做的很少。F和M提出两个建议：limit data collection on individual patient and enroll more patients in clinical trials（第二段首句）
然后看这题：
105. It can be inferred from the passage that a study limited to patients like those mentioned in lines 21–23 would have which of the following advantages over the kind of study proposed by Frazier and Mosteller?
(A) It would yield more data and its findings would be more accurate.
(B) It would cost less in the long term, though it would be more expensive in its initial stages.
(C) It would limit the number of variables researchers would need to consider when evaluating the treatment under study
(D) It would help researchers to identify subgroups of patients with secondary conditions that might also be treatable.
(E) It would enable researchers to assess the value of an experimental treatment for the average patient.
问的是老方法比新方法的优点，答案就在line21-23附近找，第二段都在说新方法会考虑到各种环境下的多种病人，当然需要考虑更多的变量，本来这段侧重说新方法考虑到的因素更多适应性更广，但是题目问到新方法缺点，也确实是处理的时候要考虑到更繁琐的因素。
至于第一段最后一句：Only in research on entirely new treatments are new and unexpected variables likely to arise.
是说F and M建议限制个人资料的收集，说这样的限制虽然增加了忽略某些因素的风险，但是这样的风险无法从实验中消除，也只有在全新的实验中会产生不可预测的变量。
（注：文章很蛋疼的就是limit同时用于background information和variables，且建议是个人资料的限制，总体收集样本的不限制：增加）

这个讲的很明白，之前两个楼层对于这个题目的分析我是没能排除A
但是这里的定位让我完全理解了为什么这题选C
手动up
谢谢这位层主