ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1540|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

弱弱的问下GWD的逻辑题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-16 19:48:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1>>>>>>Whichof the following most logically completes the argument?



The irradiation of foodkills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys asignificant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  roponents of irradiation point out thatirradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside thepoint, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since_______.

A.many of the proponentsof irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelflife

B.it is clear thatkilling bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect thatirradiation has

C.cooking is usually thefinal step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves toensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

D.certain kinds ofcooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefullycontrolled irradiation is

E.for food that is bothirradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with eitherprocess individually is compounded

答案选E 但是我怎么觉得不搭界呢.....

help~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-16 22:02:25 | 只看该作者
这个题目OG上有
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-22 07:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部