ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2756|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD一道逻辑求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-14 13:10:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive(报复性的) desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?
A.    Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B.    The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
C.    The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D.    The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
E.    Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective(客观的) assessments of government projects.


想不通为什么是B,哪位高人来指点一下江山来?小女子这厢谢过了~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-14 16:14:55 | 只看该作者
引用讨论贴:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-270754-1-7.html

Here, the scheduled projects are those which are not cancelled.

If most ofthe scheduled projects - i.e. not cancelled projects - whichare identified as wasteful were in the districts controlled by thePresident's party while most cancelled projects are from the districtscontrolled by opposition partyes, it implies that these projects arehandled to benefit to the districts controlled by President's party. Itwill contradict to what the secretary said - "So the President’s choicewas clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics."

So the secretary has to make this assumption in order to make her conclusion true.

意思是否决的那些项目不是位于反对党的地盘之内,“否决项目”不是因为党派争斗(是对事不对人)。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-15 11:44:47 | 只看该作者
哦,我晓得了~~有个scheduled和canceled区别。谢谢哈~~~O(∩_∩)O~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部