- UID
- 467430
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-23
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
A Where public-sector workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
B Where strikes by all categories of public-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
C Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
D Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
E A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from and arbitrator.
|
|