ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1600|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-3-5

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-8 21:00:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
5.    The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

这道题答案是B. 我选择的是C。因为我看到B的political consideration。。。这里的political貌似和题目无关啊?请求解释。谢谢


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-9 15:45:27 | 只看该作者
题干说:公共交通系统不该给政府管了,因为政府政治上不能提价也不能减少服务。而如果私人运作公共交通,那么私人就会追求利润,那么就不需要政府掏钱来支持运作了

那么说白了就是政府考虑一些政治上的原因所以运行公共交通入不敷出,而私人就不管你这一套,他要赚钱,所以他就不管你政治上怎么着,这就是B说的政治上的考虑不会阻止私人去赚钱,这就是题干support了B

而看C,基本上属于无中生有了,题干中没有说私人要管政府要钱,而是说私人能赚钱,所以推不出来C

btw我喜欢楼主头像,呵呵
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-28 08:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部