大全-5-20

耳朵

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.

(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.（C）

(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

  

这道题目没看懂什么意思？请NN给讲解一下题目的意思以及为什么选C。多谢！

番茄炒蛋

这题以前也讨论过挺多次的，原文有一个隐含的假设，如果对政府不利那么对工人就是有利的


For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake


这是原文的第一句，所以答案当然是c咯