OG-106

晴天小狗

1. 同问change at differential rates的意思

2. 怎么叫政府受益？value高的时候，政府的税收不是高么？也就是说政府受益。那这个时候还有必要reassess么？既然她已经受益了

   我理解成value低的时候，政府为了得到更多的利益，会reassess，以便使value上升，从而获得更多的利益。 看来是完全反了

请指点一下

晴天小狗

我顶

fantasy06

以下是引用晴天小狗在2006-9-9 15:18:00的发言：

1. 同问change at differential rates的意思

2. 怎么叫政府受益？value高的时候，政府的税收不是高么？也就是说政府受益。那这个时候还有必要reassess么？既然她已经受益了

   我理解成value低的时候，政府为了得到更多的利益，会reassess，以便使value上升，从而获得更多的利益。 看来是完全反了

请指点一下

differential:Involving differences in speed or direction of motion.
差动的：涉及速度或运动方向不同

change at differential rates: 1. at different speed: see B 2. at different direction: see C and D --- should reassess

change uniformly: 1. rise: see A 2. drop: see E----- no need for reassessment

should and likely(increase tax avenue): B and C

should and unlikely(don't increase tax avenue): D

2.  If  all property values change uniformely, i.e. at the same rate, why bother to reassess since no distortions occur, government may allow the same rate for decreased or increased value

right? 

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-18 11:15:55编辑过]

晴天小狗

以下是引用fantasy06在2006-10-18 11:11:00的发言：

differential:Involving differences in speed or direction of motion.
差动的：涉及速度或运动方向不同

change at differential rates: 1. at different speed: see B 2. at different direction: see C and D --- should reassess

change uniformly: 1. rise: see A 2. drop: see E----- no need for reassessment

should and likely(increase tax avenue): B and C

should and unlikely(don't increase tax avenue): D

2.  If  all property values change uniformely, i.e. at the same rate, why bother to reassess since no distortions occur, government may allow the same rate for decreased or increased value

right? 

 恩 对于uniformly我清楚了。 想问的是：  Property values上升，政府才会reassess吗？ 为什么这时候政府受益？

谢谢你的解答啦！

fantasy06

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per $ 1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government – that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

I think:  Because taxes are set at a flat rate(fix rate) per $1000, say  M per $1000

For assessed property value raised from $100,000 to $150,000, tax will raise from 100,000/1000 x M to 150,000/1000 x M accordingly.   It's obvious that more value, hence more tax and more benefit.

Discuss...

晴天小狗

清晰了 还是我对reassess的概念不清晰造成的

谢谢

hansomecd

政府收property的税是根据政府的assess 的value来的，而不是根据市场价格

如果市场价格上升，而政府不reassess的话，而按照原来的value征税，就少收税了。

所以才说当市场value上升的时候，政府才会去reassess，从而benefit tex reveneu

是这样吧

goyce36

谢谢楼上

jonathan1987

up

crazyyeah

以下是引用hansomecd在2008-4-17 16:20:00的发言：

政府收property的税是根据政府的assess 的value来的，而不是根据市场价格

如果市场价格上升，而政府不reassess的话，而按照原来的value征税，就少收税了。

所以才说当市场value上升的时候，政府才会去reassess，从而benefit tex reveneu

是这样吧

解释通了一方面，但为什么所有物品价值同时抬升的时候政府不reassess呢（(A) roperty values have risen sharply and uniformly）