8. (29850-!-item-!-188;#058&004527) (T-4-Q20 ��ɽ-7-22)
The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in Meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for  arkdale is only 10 percent. These figures support the conclusion that residents of Meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of  arkdale. The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account A. changes in the population density of both  arkdale and Meadowbrook over the past four years B. how the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for  arkdale C. the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in Meadowbrook and  arkdale D. the violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and  arkdale four years ago E. how Meadowbrook's expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to  arkdale's expenditures 答案是D,我选了A,想不通为什么是D 啊?? 原文已经说了犯罪率比四年前高了这点百分比了,为什么还要知道四年前的犯罪率呢? 请指教.... |