13. GWD-18-Q13 Eurasian watermilfoil, a weed not native to Frida Lake, has reproduced prolifically since being accidentally introduced there. In order to eliminate the weed, biologists proposed treating infested parts of the lake with a certain herbicide that is nontoxic for humans and aquatic animals. However, the herbicide might damage populations of certain rare plant species that the lake contains. For this reason local officials rejected the proposal.
Which of the following, if true, points out the most serious weakness in the officials’ grounds for rejecting the biologists’ proposal?
A. The continuing spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Frida Lake threatens to choke out the lake’s rare plant species. B. Because of ecological conditions prevailing in its native habitat, Eurasian watermilfoil is not as dominant there as it is in Frida Lake. C. The proliferation of Eurasian watermilfoil in Frida Lake has led to reductions in the populations of some species of aquatic animals. D. Although Eurasian watermilfoil could be mechanically removed from Frida Lake, eliminating the weed would take far longer this way than it would using herbicides. E. Unless Eurasian watermilfoil is completely eliminated from Frida Lake, it will quickly spread again once herbicide treatments or other control measures cease.
答案为A。 但是,当时我想,因为用除草剂会危及rare plant species,可根据A的话,不用除草剂的话EW的spread也会危及到rare plant species,那就没有理由说拒绝使用是不对的了啊~反正结果危害了rare species。然后很抽的选了C。麻烦帮我拉回来吧~我进入牛角尖,想不通了。谢谢大家 |