求助蓝本上的一道逻辑题~

cynthia627

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.
Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.
(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.
(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable.

OA:c

这道题的c我知道是正确的，但是a为什么错呢？og上面说是因为threshold的原因，可是看了半天我还是没有理解~ 麻烦各位帮忙了！万分感谢！

cynthia627

自己顶一下~ 谢谢大家，帮帮忙啊！

斯巴达克

感觉相关性吧，前面那么多废话说科技帮助太阳能成本下降，所以你答案也要科技帮助Oil成本下降。