ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4877|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12th--CR No.100 求助~!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-30 23:51:00 | 只看该作者

OG 12th--CR No.100 求助~!!

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.

(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

这一题的问题到底在讲什么?我被题目搞晕了···也不知道选什么···

OG的解释说的是

Which one condition does NOT recommend benchmarking against noncompetitors? Which one condition IS a well-founded reason to benchmark against competitors?

我实在是···没把这个和那一长串题目联系起来···

沙发
发表于 2009-10-1 02:04:00 | 只看该作者

问题问的是: 如果一个公司用benchmarking来和非竞争对手而不是竞争对手来比较 下面哪一个不是好理由

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-2 20:00:00 | 只看该作者

意思就是要给与noncompetitors竞争找一个理由?

support题?

地板
发表于 2009-10-4 02:36:00 | 只看该作者

答案是E吧?这道题的意思就是如果这个benchmark法真的管用的话,哪个选项不能说明benchmark只能用在非行业对手身上?或者说哪个选项不能说明benchmark不适用于同行业对手?

E选项基本没涉及问题内容,还略有support的意味,如果最后一个their是指代competition的话

5#
发表于 2009-10-6 21:44:00 | 只看该作者
E吧, 这道题衡量的标准是 manager discover practice     而E说的是practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or mark 
6#
发表于 2009-12-3 13:19:17 | 只看该作者
题目是问:以下选项,如果正确,会有理由来说明benchmarking用以衡量公司和其它非竞争的公司的表现,而不是和竞争的公司的表现是合理(或有效)的,除了。。。
等同于,要你在选项中找出一个来证明benchmarking用以衡量公司与非竞争公司的表现是不合理的,与竞争公司的表现是合理的。
A,和竞争公司相比较,只会有很少的新的实践,因此需要benchmarking against非竞争公司.(反面支持)
B.得到竞争对手的"绝招"很难,因此.....(反面支持)
C.和竞争对手之间在efficiency有某种程度的相同,只有benchmarking against非竞争公司才能得到...(正面支持)
D.经理们更易于接受来自于自己所处行业以外的观点,即从非竞争者处。(正面支持)
E.好公司的大多数成功是由于他们采取了那些利用了他们特殊的市场环境的操作。(实际上是benchmarking against 竞争公司)
7#
发表于 2010-3-17 14:45:33 | 只看该作者
看懂了 谢谢
8#
发表于 2010-11-25 21:57:55 | 只看该作者
谢谢!
9#
发表于 2010-11-27 14:15:24 | 只看该作者
我觉得是E 但是完全是排除法 因为前四个都是很明确的支持了应该benchmarking against non-competitor 虽然E我根本没看懂什么意思
10#
发表于 2014-5-18 14:27:43 | 只看该作者
jinwch 发表于 2009-12-3 13:19
题目是问:以下选项,如果正确,会有理由来说明benchmarking用以衡量公司和其它非竞争的公司的表现,而不是 ...

很清晰,谢谢你!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 01:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部